Guild Building LLC Et al v. Jake Zimmerman, Assessor St. Louis County

August 23rd, 2018

State Tax Commission of Missouri

 

GUILD BUILDING LLC et al )    
  )    
                            Complainant, )   Appeal No. 15-13763[1]
  )    
v. )    
  )    
JAKE ZIMMERMAN, ASSESSOR )    
ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI, )    
                            Respondent. )    

 

 

DECISION AND ORDER

 

HOLDING

 

Complainants failed to present substantial and persuasive evidence that there was an intentional plan by the assessing officials to assess the property under appeal at a ratio greater than 32% of true value in money or at a ratio grossly excessive to the average 2015 commercial assessment ratio for St. Louis County.

Complainants appeared by counsels Thomas Campbell (discrimination) and Jason Turk (valuation).

Jake Zimmerman, Assessor of St. Louis County, Missouri (Respondent) appeared by counsel Jeremy Shook.

Case heard by Senior Hearing Officer John Treu and Chief Counsel Maureen Monaghan and decided by Monaghan (Hearing Officer).

ISSUE

The Commission takes this appeal to determine whether there was an intentional plan by the assessing officials to assess the property under appeal at a ratio greater than 32% of true value in money, or at a ratio grossly excessive to the average 2015 commercial assessment ratio for St. Louis County.

FINDINGS OF FACT

  1. 1. Jurisdiction. Jurisdiction over this appeal is proper.  Complainant timely appealed to the STC.
  2. Evidentiary Hearing. The issue of commercial ratio was presented at an evidentiary hearing on March 13-14, 2017, at 7733 Forsyth, Clayton, Missouri.
  3. Identification of Subject Property. A complete list of properties identified by parcel number is attached as Decision Exhibit A.
  4. Assessment. Respondent determined a TVM for the subject properties and classified them as commercial.  Respondent assessed the properties at the statutory commercial rate of 32% of TVM.
  5. Board of Equalization. On September 18, 2015, the BOE notified the property owner that it “reviewed all evidence submitted regarding [the property] and … determined the valuation of [the subject] property for 2015”.  The property was classified as commercial.  The assessed value was set at the statutory commercial assessed ratio of 32% of TVM.
  6. Discrimination  Complainants failed to present substantial and persuasive evidence that there was an intentional plan by the assessing officials to assess property at a ratio greater than 32% of true value in money or at a ratio grossly excessive to the average 2015 commercial assessment ratio for St. Louis County.

EVIDENCE PRESENTED

The issue of commercial ratio was presented as to all commercial ratio appeals at an evidentiary hearing on March 13-14, 2017, at 7733 Forsyth, Clayton, Missouri.

Level of Assessment – Ratio Studies

Each party presented an expert in the field of appraisal, mass appraisal, and assessment ratio studies (Exhibits A and 1) as well as the experts’ study on the commercial assessments in St. Louis County for 2015 (ratio study) (Exhibits C and 2).  Ratio studies provide information regarding the level and equity of assessments.  Studies use a statistically significant number of properties and compare an assessor’s value for those properties to a market value proxy for those properties.  The market value proxy is either the sale prices of properties in the jurisdiction within a relevant time period or an independent appraisal of randomly selected properties.   In this appeal, the ratio studies utilized recent sales.  In the studies, the experts use the following terms:

  • Appraisal Level: Overall ratio of assessor’s values to market values. Level measurements provide information about the degree to which goals or legal requirements are met. Estimates of appraisal level are based on measures of central tendency.
  • Assessed Value: Legally authorized fraction of market value.
  • Assessment: Determination of true value, classification and location within taxing districts for ad valorem taxation.
  • Coefficient of Dispersion (COD): It measures the average percentage of deviation of the ratios from the median ratio. A lower COD implies a lesser amount of variability or more equity in assessments.
  • Computer-Assisted Mass Appraisal (CAMA): A process that uses a system of integrated components and software tools necessary to support the appraisal of a universe of properties through the use of mathematical models that represent the relationship between property values and supply/demand factors.
  • Equalization: The process by which an appropriate governmental body attempts to ensure that property under its jurisdiction is assessed at the same assessment ratio or at the ratio or ratios required by law.
  • Mean: The arithmetic average.  It is created by adding together all individual samples and dividing by the number of samples.
  • Median: The middle observation when the values of the data are arrayed. It divides the data into two parts.
  • Price-Related Bias (PRB): It is used to measure assessment equity (regressivity/progressivity). It measures the relationship between assessment-sales ratios and value in percentage terms. For example, a PRB of .05 indicates that, on average, assessment ratios increase by 5% whenever values double.
  • Price Related Differential (PRD): Itis calculated to measure assessment regressivity or progressivity.  It is found by dividing the mean by the weighted mean.  The comparison tests for equity between low value properties and high value properties.  A PRD above 1.00 suggests that the assessment values placed on high-value parcels are relatively lower than the assessment values placed on low-value parcels.
  • Progressivity: Taxation is imposed in such a manner that the tax rate decreases as the amount subject to taxation decreases.
  • Ratio Study: Sales or appraisal based study designed to evaluate appraisal performance to determine if statutory requirements are met. Studies can be used to evaluate the degree of discrimination and to adjust assessed values on appealed properties to the common level.
  • Regressivity: Taxation is imposed in such a manner that tax rate decreases as the amount subject to taxation increases.
  • True Value in Money: Also referred to as appraised value, market value, or fair market value.
  • Weighted mean: It is the sum of the assessed values divided by the sum of the individual indicators of market value.

2015 St. Louis County Commercial Ratio

             The Complainant[2] filed the following Exhibits, which were admitted into evidence:

Exhibit Description
A Written Direct Testimony of Robert Gloudemans
B Written Direct Testimony of John Hottle
C Commercial Ratio Study of Robert Gloudemans
D Supplement to Appendix 2 of Exhibit C
  Sur-Rebuttal
E Testimony of Robert Gloudemans
F Testimony of John Hottle
G Impact Notice 10L420653
H Impact Notice 13K520081
I Impact Notice 14N120030, Letters from Assessor
J Impact Notice 15N130407, Letters from Assessor
K Impact Notice 15K240583
L BOE Decision 16M530069, Impact Notice
M Impact Notice 16P610696, Letters from Assessor
N Impact Notice 19Q140113
O BOE Decision 21K331251, Impact Notice
P BOE Decision 22S121644, Impact Notice
Q Impact Notice 23S540286, Letters from Assessor
R Impact Notice 28L640434
S Impact Notice 29H210253, Letters from Assessor

 

Robert Gloudemans (Gloudemans) is a partner in Almy, Gloudemans, Jacobs & Denne.  He is a tax consultant specializing in property tax assessment administration and has been engaged in such work for over 40 years.  (Exhibit A, pp 1-2) He was hired by Joseph C. Sansone Company[3] to analyze the assessment of commercial property in St. Louis County for tax year 2015, more specifically, to determine the average level of assessment for commercial property as of January 1, 2015. (Exhibit A p.7) Gloudemans prepared a report of his findings.  (Exhibit C)

To analyze the assessment of commercial property in St. Louis County for tax year 2015, Gloudemans used sales of commercial property in St. Louis County that occurred from July 2014 through June 2015. (Exhibit C p.1)  The study utilized data from the St. Louis County Assessor’s Office regarding sales of commercial properties. (Exhibit C p.2)  After narrowing the sales, the number of sales requiring validation was 585 sales involving 768 parcels. (Exhibit C p.2)   The commercial sales were provided to Hottle for validation per IAAO[4] standards. (Exhibit C p.3)

Hottle was provided with sales data obtained from the St. Louis County Assessor’s Office.  Hottle worked with Gloudemans to ensure the sales validation process complied with IAAO standard for ratio studies. (Exhibit C p.3)   Hottle Appraisal Company validated sales of commercial properties occurring in St. Louis County between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2015.  (Exhibit B)  The process included verification from a party involved in the transaction, third party information as to the transaction, and evaluation of whether the sale was representative of typical market transactions based on property type and location. (Exhibit B p.5)  Of the 585 sales requiring validation, 258 sales were found to be valid, arm’s-length transactions.  (Exhibit C p.5)

Gloudemans used the validated sales for his analysis.  (Exhibit C p.6) Two of the sales were removed from the study as “outliers,” one with a very low ratio and one with a very high ratio.  (Exhibit C p. 9)

Gloudemans computed three measures of central tendency for his ratio study – the median, the mean and the weighted mean.  (Exhibit C p. 9) The median is the middle number in a set of numbers.  The mean is the average or the sum of the numbers divided by the total count of numbers.  The weighted mean is the weighted average of the ratios when each ratio is weighted by its sale price, i.e., the sum of the assessed values divided by the sum of the TVM proxy (sale price).

Gloudemans reported the following findings for commercial assessments in St. Louis County in 2015:

Mean     100.3%
Weighted Mean     81.2%
  Assessment Ratio 26%  
Median     95.5%
  Assessment Ratio 30.7%  
PRD     1.235
COD     .308
PRB     -.053

 

Gloudemans found overall ratios of a mean of 1.003%, median of .959 and weighted mean of .812.  In other words the measures indicate an assessment ratio of 32.09%, 30.69% and 25.98% depending on the measure of central tendency.

Gloudemans relied on the weighted mean as the most appropriate measure of the average level of assessment.  Gloudemans recommended that the STC adopt a weighted mean of 26% as the average level of assessment of commercial property in St. Louis County in 2015.

Respondent’s Evidence

The Respondent filed the following Exhibits which were admitted into evidence:

Exhibit Description
1 Testimony of Patrick O’Connor
2 Study of Patrick O’Connor
3 IAAO Standard on Ratio Studies
4 Spreadsheet – 145 sales used
5 2015 Ratio Study
6 Testimony of Steve Robertson
7 Spread sheet of sales from 1/1/15 to 12/31/15
8 Testimony of Sandy Youtzy
  Rebuttal
9 Testimony of John Gillick
10 CV of John Gillick
11 SLCo sale file of 18K310513
12A SLCo sale file for 12M330315
12B SLCo sale file for 12M330315
13 SLCo sale file for 13J330980.
14 SLCo sale file for 18K310997
15 SLCo sale file for 23T531199
16 SLCo sale file for 28P440441
17 SLCo sale file for 26G112010
18 SLCo sale file for 26K640466
19 SLCo sale file for 17N540851
20 SLCo sale file for 27K111697
21 SLCo sale file for 16H421088
22 SLCo sale file for 09N120191
23A SLCo sale file for 17L441202
23B SLCo sale file for 17L441202
24A SLCo sale file for 24M221111
24B SLCo sale file for 25M543135
25 SLCo sale file for 17N430563
26 Testimony of Patrick O’Connor
  Sur-rebuttal
27 Sur-rebuttal Testimony of Steve Robertson
28 Sur-rebuttal Testimony of Sandy Youtzy
29 St. Louis County Board of Equalization Memorandum of Waiver, dated 8/28/15, as to Keefe

 

            Witness Patrick M. O’Conner (O’Connor) testified on behalf of the county.  O’Conner is a Certified General Real Estate Appraiser. (Exhibit 1 p.1)  He has been involved in mass appraisal since 1973. (Exhibit 1 p. 2)

He prepared a report involving:

  1. Sales ratio study as of January 1, 2015;
  2. Statistical review of a separate file of sales prices for commercial properties from 2011 through 2015;
  3. Application of direct market models to a sample of sold and unsold commercial properties as of the valuation date of January 1, 2015;
  4. Performance of a direct market model values-to sales prices ratio study on a sample of sold properties; and
  5. Performance of appraisal ratio studies of 2015 appraised-to-direct market model values on a sample of sold and unsold commercial properties. (Exhibit 2 p.1)

 

O’Connor’s ratio study used 145 commercial sales from the last three quarters of 2014 and the first three quarters of 2015.  O’Connor determined the following:

Mean     N/A
Weighted Mean     N/A
  Assessment Ratio Not Calculated  
Median     96.5%
  Assessment Ratio 31%  
PRD     105%
COD     16.8%
PRB     -1.2%

 

O’Connor inadvertently used post-BOE TVM rather than Assessor’s value (pre-BOE) in his study on 13 of the 145 properties.  The BOE adopted the sales price as TVM as to those properties.  The result is a 1:1 ratio of sale price to BOE valuation.  The use of the properties had no impact on the findings.

O’Connor found little indication of regressivity.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION

Jurisdiction

The Commission has jurisdiction to hear this appeal and correct any assessment which is shown to be unlawful, unfair, arbitrary or capricious.  The hearing officer shall issue a decision and order affirming, modifying or reversing the determination of the board of equalization, and correcting any assessment which is unlawful, unfair, improper, arbitrary, or capricious. Article X, section 14, Mo. Const. of 1945; Sections 138.430, 138.431, 138.431.4, RSMo. 

Official and Judicial Notice

Agencies shall take official notice of all matters of which the courts take judicial notice. Section 536.070(6), RSMo.

Courts will take judicial notice of their own records in the same cases.  State ex rel. Horton v. Bourke, 129 S.W.2d 866, 869 (1939); Barth v. Kansas City Elevated Railway Company, 44 S.W. 788, 781 (1898).  In addition, courts may take judicial notice of records in earlier cases when justice requires or when it is necessary for a full understanding of the instant appeal. Burton v. Moulder, 245 S.W.2d 844, 846 (Mo. 1952); Knorp v. Thompson, 175 S.W.2d 889, 894 (1943); Bushman v. Barlow, 15 S.W.2d 329, 332 (Mo. banc 1929) State ex rel St. Louis Public Service Company v. Public Service Commission, 291 S.W.2d 95, 97 (Mo. banc 1956).  Courts may take judicial notice of their own records in prior proceedings involving the same parties and basically the same facts.  In re Murphy, 732 S.W.2d 895, 902 (Mo. banc 1987); State v. Gilmore, 681 S.W.2d 934, 940 (Mo. banc 1984); State v. Keeble, 399 S.W.2d 118, 122 (Mo. 1966).

Presumption of Correctness of BOE

 

There is a presumption of validity, good faith and correctness of assessment by the County Board of Equalization.  Hermel, Inc. v. STC, 564 S.W.2d 888, 895 (Mo. banc 1978); Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. STC, 436 S.W.2d 650, 656 (Mo. 1968); May Department Stores Co. v. STC, 308 S.W.2d 748, 759 (Mo. 1958).   This presumption is a rebuttable rather than a conclusive presumption.   The presumption of correct assessment is rebutted when the taxpayer presents substantial and persuasive evidence to establish that the Board’s valuation is erroneous and what the fair market value should have been placed on the property. Hermel, supra; Cupples-Hesse Corporation v. State Tax Commission, 329 S.W.2d 696, 702 (Mo. 1959).

Duty to Investigate

In order to investigate appeals filed with the STC, the STC has the duty to inquire of the owner of the property or of any other party to the appeal regarding any matter or issue relevant to the valuation, subclassification or assessment of the property.  The Commission’s decision regarding the assessment or valuation of the property may be based solely upon its inquiry and any evidence presented by the parties, or based solely upon evidence presented by the parties. Section 138.430.2, RSMo.

 

Weight to be Given Evidence

The STCs not bound by any single formula, rule or method in determining true value in money, but is free to consider all pertinent facts and estimates and give them such weight as reasonably they may be deemed entitled.  The relative weight to be accorded any relevant factor in a particular case is for the Commission to decide. St. Louis County v. Security Bonhomme, Inc., 558 S.W.2d 655, 659 (Mo. banc 1977); St. Louis County v. STC, 515 S.W.2d 446, 450 (Mo. 1974); Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company v. STC, 436 S.W.2d 650 (Mo. 1968).

Trier of Fact

The STC as the trier of fact may consider the testimony of an expert witness and give it as much weight and credit as they may deem it entitled to when viewed in connection with all other circumstances.  The Commission is not bound by the opinions of experts who testify on the issue of reasonable value, but may believe all or none of the expert’s testimony and accept it in part or reject it in part. St. Louis County v. Boatmen’s Trust Co., 857 S.W.2d 453, 457 (Mo. App. E.D. 1993); Vincent by Vincent v. Johnson, 833 S.W.2d 859, 865 (Mo. 1992); Beardsley v. Beardsley, 819 S.W.2d 400, 403 (Mo. App. 1991); Curnow v. Sloan, 625 S.W.2d 605, 607 (Mo. banc 1981).

Opinion Testimony by Experts

If specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert on that subject, by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto. The facts or data upon which an expert bases an opinion or inference may be those perceived by or made known to the expert at or before the hearing and must be of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the field in forming opinions or inferences upon the subject and must be otherwise reliable, but the facts or data need not be admissible in evidence. Section 490.065, RSMo; State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. McDonagh, 123 S.W.3d 146 (Mo. SC. 2004); Courtroom Handbook on Missouri Evidence, Wm. A. Schroeder, Sections 702-505, pp. 325-350; Wulfing v. Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc., 842 S.W.2d 133 (Mo. App. E.D. 1992).

Three expert witnesses were presented at the hearing as to the average level of assessment of commercial property in St. Louis County in 2015[5].  All experts had experience in appraisal and mass appraisal for ad valorem tax purposes as well as the review of valuation by mass appraisal.

 

 Complainant’s Burden of Proof

The taxpayer is the moving party seeking affirmative relief, therefore, the taxpayer bears the burden of proving the vital elements of the case, i.e., the assessment was “unlawful, unfair, improper, arbitrary or capricious,” by substantial and persuasive evidence. See, Westwood Partnership v. Gogarty, 103 S.W.3d 152 (Mo. App. E.D. 2003); Daly v. P. D. George Co., 77 S.W.3d 645 (Mo. App. E.D. 2002); Reeves v. Snider, 115 S.W.3d 375 (Mo. App. S.D. 2003).  Industrial Development Authority of Kansas City v. State Tax Commission of Missouri, 804 S.W.2d 387, 392 (Mo. App. 1991).

Substantial evidence can be defined as such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. See, Cupples-Hesse Corporation v. State Tax Commission, 329 S.W.2d 696, 702 (Mo. 1959).  Persuasive evidence is that evidence which has sufficient weight and probative value to convince the trier of fact.  The persuasiveness of evidence does not depend on the quantity or amount thereof but on its effect in inducing belief.

Brooks v. General Motors Assembly Division, 527 S.W.2d 50, 53 (Mo. App. 1975).

Ratio/Discrimination

Complainants allege discrimination as their ground for appeal.  The issue is whether the assessment is in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, as it attempts to deprive and deny the Complainant the equal protection of the laws.  “The purpose of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is to secure every person within the state’s jurisdiction against intentional and arbitrary discrimination, whether occasioned by express terms of a statute or by its improper execution through duly constituted agents.”  Sunday Lake Iron Co v Wakefield Tp, 247 U.S. 350, 38 S. Ct 495, 62 L.Ed 1154 (1918)

To obtain a reduction in assessed value based upon discrimination, the complaining taxpayer must (1) prove the true value in money of the subject property as of the taxing date; and (2) show an intentional plan of discrimination by the assessor, which resulted in an assessment at a greater percentage of value than other property within the same class and the same taxing district, or, in the absence of such an intentional plan, show that the level of assessment is “so grossly excessive as to be inconsistent with an honest exercise of judgment.”  Zimmerman v. Mid–America Financial Corp., 481 S.W.3d 564, 571 (Mo. App. E.D. 2015), quoting Savage v. State Tax Comm’n of Missouri, 722 S.W.2d 72, 78 (Mo. banc 1986).

Given the two-part test for proving a claim of discrimination in the context of ad valorem taxation as stated by Missouri courts, in the instant appeal, Complainants were first required to prove the TVM of the subject property.  Complainants presented as evidence of TVM the Decision and determination of value by the BOE.   The BOE “reviewed all the evidence submitted…and…determined the valuation of [the subject] property for 2015” was that of the Respondent’s TVM. (BOE Decision) The assessed values as set by the Respondent were set at a ratio consistent with the statutory commercial assessed ratio of 32%.  In other words, the actual level of assessment of the subject properties in these appeals was 32%.

The second part of the test requires Complainants to show an intentional plan of discrimination by the assessor, which resulted in an assessment at a greater percentage of value than other property within the same class and the same taxing district, or, in the absence of such an intentional plan, show that the level of assessment is “so grossly excessive as to be inconsistent with an honest exercise of judgment.  There is no evidence that there was an intentional plan of discrimination by the assessing officials, so we must determine if the Complainant presented substantial and persuasive evidence to show that the level of their assessment is so grossly excessive as to be inconsistent with an honest exercise of judgment.

Missouri courts have consistently held that the proper method of determining discrimination is to compare the actual level of assessment of the subject property as determined by the assessor to the common level of assessment for the subject property’s subclass.  Mid-America Financial Corp., 481 S.W.3d at 574, citing Savage, 722 S.W.2d at 72.

“By requiring that the level of an assessment be so grossly excessive as to be inconsistent with an honest exercise of judgment in cases in which intentional discrimination is not shown, the courts and the STC refrain from correcting assessments which reflect no more than de minimus errors of judgment on the part of assessors.”  Mid-America Financial Corp., 481 S.W.3d at 571 (internal quotation omitted).  “This standard recognizes that while practical uniformity is the constitutional goal, absolute uniformity is an unattainable ideal.”  Id. (internal quotation omitted).

In deciding whether the assessment of the subject property is “grossly excessive” or nothing more than a “de minimus error of judgment,” the STC must determine the common level of assessment for the class of property at issue within the taxing district.   In Savage, 722 S.W.2d at 79, the Missouri Supreme Court reasoned:

The “common level of assessment” has been defined as a single ratio of true value used in assessing each property in a taxing district.  [citation omitted]  The “average level of assessment” means the “arithmetical mean of the varying percentages of true value applied by . . . the assessor in assessing properties within a taxing district.”  [citation omitted]

A taxpayer has the right to have his “assessment reduced to the percentage of that value at which others are taxed[.]” [citation omitted]

 

The Missouri Supreme Court has held that the proper method of analyzing discrimination compares the common level of assessment for similarly-situated properties to the actual level of assessment imposed on the subject property.  Mid-America Financial Corp., 481 S.W.3d at 571; Savage, 722 S.W.2d at 74.  A necessary component of this comparison is the TVM of both the subject property and the similarly-situated properties, i.e., properties within the same class as the subject property.  See Id.; see also Savage, 722 S.W.2d at 74.  Once the TVM of the subject property and the similarly-situated properties has been determined, the STC can calculate at what percentage or ratio of TVM the subject property and the similarly-situated properties, respectively, have been assessed.  Mid-America Financial Corp., 481 S.W.3d at 571.  This determination requires a comparison not between the common level of assessment and the statutory assessment ratio, but between the common level of assessment and the actual level of assessment for the subject property.  Id. at 574.   Neither Missouri courts nor the STC has established a “bright-line” test to identify what constitutes a grossly excessive assessment as opposed to a mere de minimus error in judgment.  Id. at 575.  The assessment in each given case must be analyzed against the assessment under the median ratio to address the grossly excessive factor.  Id.  The STC has found a 5% disparity between the common level of assessment and the actual level assessment to be de minimusTown and Country Racquet Club v. Morton, 1989 WL 41005 (Missouri State Tax Commission) (affirmed on appeal in Town & Country Racquet Club v. State Tax Commission of Missouri, 811 S.W.2d 403 (Mo. App. E.D. 1991).

Appropriate Measure

It is established under Missouri law that when a taxpayer’s property is subject to an assessment proportionately higher than other property in the same class, the assessment should be reduced. See, e.g., Koplar v. State Tax Commission, 321 S.W.2d 686 (Mo. 1959). The Constitutions of Missouri and the United States require that the subject property be assessed at a ratio no higher than the common level or average for the same class of subject. Fourteenth Amendment, U.S. Constitution, Article X, Sections 3, 4(a), Missouri Constitution 1945; Breckenridge Hotels v. Leachman, 571 S.W.2d 251, 252 (Mo. banc 1978)May Department Stores Company v. State Tax Commission, 308 S.W.2d 748, 762 (Mo. 1958).

To determine the common level of assessment, the experts looked to measures of central tendency.  In this case, the issue of dispute between the parties is the proper measure of central tendency: the median, mean or the weighted mean.

The inquiry in a discrimination appeal is to determine a single ratio representing the assessments of varying properties within the same classification – the average or common level of assessment.  Complainant argues that the assessments in St. Louis County in 2015 for commercial properties were regressive – assessment ratio decreases as the value of the property increases.  Complainant argues that when regressivity is present, the weighted mean is the only appropriate measure.

The Complainant is one of more than 2,600 claims of discrimination by commercial property owners in St. Louis County for the 2015-2016 assessment cycle.  The valuations of the properties vary.  The STC cannot look at any particular property value and determine that all properties in excess of that value are subject to discrimination; “there is no dividing line”. (Tr. Vol II. P. 231)    The evidence did not establish a point estimate for all properties within the subclass, i.e. there is no common level of assessment. Commercial properties, according to the Complainant’s study, are over assessed, accurately assessed, and under assessed.  Isolated and uncoordinated reductions in selected assessments could produce additional disparities, i.e., discrimination.

All three experts calculated a median.  The medians calculated by the three experts were within a consistent range.  The calculated medians ranged between 30.7% and 31.1%.  The parties’ median levels of assessment are within .004 of each other.  Such consistent findings as to the median assessment are substantial and persuasive. The median level of assessment in St. Louis County for 2015 was approximately 31%.  In previous decisions, the STC found 5% disparity to be de minimusTown and Country Racquet Club v. Morton, 1989 WL 41005.  Such disparity between the statutory level of assessment and the average level of assessment is not so grossly excessive as to be entirely inconsistent with an honest exercise of judgment and, hence, does not prove discrimination.

Complainant’s argument to use weighted mean is not persuasive.  It is the only measure of central tendency that indicated a disparity in commercial assessments.  Other statistical measures, such as the mean, median, or COD utilized by the experts in their studies, did not indicate discrimination in assessments.  One statistical measure found within a study is not substantial and persuasive evidence.

The same issue was raised in Industrial Development Authority of Kansas City v. John Kelley, Jackson County, 1989 WL 96234 (Mo. St. Tax Comm.)  The STC, in that decision, stated “[i]t is generally accepted that when adjusting individual assessments to the average level of assessment the median ratio should be used.”  The STC has consistently accepted such measure of central tendency. Zimmerman v. Mid-America Financial Corporation, 481 S.W.3d 564, 577 (Mo. Ct App. ED, 2015) and West County BMW v. Muehlheausler, STC 05-12569.  The STC’s Assessor Manual sets forth that the median is the measure to determine if a county is accurately assessing property.  A finding that the median is the most persuasive measure of central tendency is a reasonable and sound finding in a particular appeal based upon evidence presented.

ORDER

The assessed valuations for the subject properties as determined by the BOE for the subject tax day are AFFIRMED.

A party may file with the Commission an application for review of this decision within thirty days of the mailing date set forth in the Certificate of Service for this Decision.  The application shall contain specific facts or law as grounds upon which it is claimed the decision is erroneous.  Said application must be in writing addressed to the State Tax Commission of Missouri, P.O. Box 146, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0146, and a copy of said application must be sent to each person at the address listed below in the certificate of service.

            Failure to state specific facts or law upon which the application for review is based will result in summary denial. Section 138.432, RSMo

Disputed Taxes

The Collector of St. Louis County, as well as the collectors of all affected political subdivisions therein, shall continue to hold the disputed taxes pending the possible filing of an Application for Review, unless said taxes have been disbursed pursuant to a court order under the provisions of Section 139.031.8, RSMo.

Any Finding of Fact which is a Conclusion of Law or Decision shall be so deemed.  Any Decision which is a Finding of Fact or Conclusion of Law shall be so deemed.

SO ORDERED August 23, 2018.

STATE TAX COMMISSION OF MISSOURI

 

Maureen Monaghan

Hearing Officer

 

Certificate of Service

 

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been emailed or mailed postage prepaid on this August 23, 2018, to:  Thomas Campbell, Polsinelli, 100 S. Fourth Street, Suite 100, St. Louis, MO  63102, Attorney for Complainant; Jason Turk, Blitz, Bargett & Deutsch, LLC, 120 S. Central Ave, Suite 1500, St. Louis, MO  63105, Attorney for Complainant; Jeremy Shook, 1 Brentwood Blvd, Suite 800, Clayton, MO  63105, Attorney for Respondent; Jake Zimmerman, Assessor, County Government Center, 41 South Central Avenue, Clayton, MO 63105; Mark Devore, Collector, County Government Center, 41 South Central Avenue, Clayton, MO 63105.

 

Jackie Wood

Legal Coordinator

 

Complainants represented by PAR Tax Representative and Counsel Patrick Keefe filed the following exhibits as part of the hearing to determine the common level of assessment (ratio) for commercial properties in St. Louis County in 2015:

Exhibit Description
A Written Direct Testimony of Robert Denne
B CV of Robert Denne
C Assessment Ratio Study
D Written Direct Testimony of Timothy Schoemehl
E Qualifications of Timothy Schoemehl
F CD ROM  St Louis County Assessment Roll
G CD ROM St Louis County Assessment Roll 2016
H Excel File – Commercial Sales 2014 – 2015 (on CD)
I Excel File – Revised Sales List(on CD)
J Excel File – Stratum Cods(on CD)
K PDF Locator – Neighborhood Chart(on CD)
L Real Estate Data Extract
M Excel File – ComlOnlySalesWork data file (on CD)
N Excel File – Supplemental List for Tim (on CD)
O Commercial Sales Review Form
P Codes
Q CD ROM Deed Images from Metropolitan Title Data, Inc
R DVD-ROM Assessor’s Certificates of Value (2014 & 2015)
S DVD-ROM Assessor’s Sales Research Packages (2014)
T DVD-ROM Assessor’s Sales Research Packages (2015)
U Excel File Worksheet Draft 9-7-2016 (on CD)
V Validated Sales from Tim (on CD)
W Validated Sales from Tim with trim notes (on CD)
X IAAO Standard on Ratio Studies 2013 (on CD)
Y IAAO Standard on Verification and Adjustment of Sales (on CD)
Z STC Assessor Manual, Chapter 4, Ratio Studies (2016) (on CD)
Rebuttal
AA Rebuttal Report of Robert C. Denne
BB Written Direct Testimony of Robert C. Denne
Surrebuttal
CC Written Direct Testimony of Timothy Schoemehl
DD Sales Verification Questionnaire – 21 N. Meramec
EE Sales Verification Questionnaire – 32K130454
FF Real Estate Information 12M330315
GG Article dated May 1-7, 2015
HH Commercial Sales Summary
II Real Estate Information 16H421088
JJ Sales Verification Questionnaire
KK Press Release
LL Press Release
MM Deed
NN Phillips Edison  SEC Report
OO Written Direct Testimony of Reobrt C. Denne
PP Study using pre-BOE valuations
QQ Study using pre-BOE valuations
RR CD Rom – 2015-2016 Commercial Assessments
SS BOE Decision 19Q130163

 

 

 

Decision Exhibit A

 

Appeal No. Complainanant Parcel Number
15-13763 Guild Buildingllc 17O341121
15-13771 Royal Banks Ofmissouri 16P130976
15-13772 Royal Banks Of Missouri 18K641822
15-13773 1977 Properties L L C Etal 15O340096
15-13776 Hillyard Sales Company Eastern 14O320525
15-13777 J D Streett & Company Inc 29G530013
15-13778 J D Street & Company Inc 14O620474
15-13779 J D Streett & Company Inc 29Q620906
15-13780 J D Streett & Company Inc 26P320507
15-13781 West Five Ltd Mckee Realty Co 13K620093
15-13782 James O West Family Limited Partnership 12K110313
15-13783 James O West Family Limited Partnership 12K110571
15-13784 James O West Family Limited Partnership 12K121131
15-13785 James O West Family Limited Partnership 12K121142
15-13786 James O West Family Limited Partnership 12K110362
15-13787 Carmelo J Natoli Family Partnership L P 17U110332
15-13788 Carmelo J Natoli Family Partnership L P 17U130099
15-13789 Chesterfield Mtbb Corp A Mo Corp 19S440480
15-13790 Chesterfield Stemme Inc 18S240410
15-13791 Chesterfield Stemme Inc 18S520602
15-13792 Chesterfield Village Inc 17T320158
15-13793 Chesterfield Stemme Ii Inc A Mo Corp 18S240311
15-13794 Chesterfield 1400 Inc A Mo Corp 18S210105
15-13795 Chesterfield Payne Corp 19S440567
15-13796 Chesterfield Northeast Inc A Mo Corp 18S240179
15-13797 Chesterfield 500 Corp 18S140365
15-13798 Chesterfield 500 Corp A Mo Corp 18S140387
15-13799 Chesterfield Center Corp A Mo Corp 18S120093
15-13800 Chesterfield Elbridge Corp 18S240421
15-13801 Chesterfield Elbridge Corp 18S240443
15-13802 Chesterfield Ridge Center I Corp A Mo 18S420052
15-13803 Four Hundred Chesterfieldcenter Inc 18S140431
15-13827 Hoovie L P 14N230443
15-13828 Kramer Assets Group L L C 17V620159
15-13829 Gerst Development A Partnership 10M340419
15-13830 Tubular Steel Inc 09K210130
15-13831 Naples Milfield Venture LLC Etal 17V510281
15-13833 Usf Propco I I LLC 16K540015
15-13835 Carol House Furniture Inc 15N620102
15-13836 Carol House Furniture Inc 26Q641120
15-13839 Bausch & Lomb Inc 22P410062
15-13840 Markwort Sporting Goods Company 16M240285
15-13841 Markwort Sporting Goods Company 16M240322
15-13842 Markwort Sporting Goods Company 16M240405
15-13843 S L Airport Hotel L L C 12K110153
15-13844 Wherry Barbara Jean Trustee 14O620254
15-13845 Electro Credit Union 15O310734
15-13850 Heutel Patricia J Trustee 27M340110
15-13851 Tmh Real Estate LLC Etal 27M340341
15-13852 Tmh Real Estate LLC Etal 27L130473
15-13853 Saco Auto Limited Partnership 27L130484
15-13854 Heutel Thomas M Michel H/W Etal 27L130198
15-13856 Sunset Hills Land Companyinc 27L130385
15-13857 Sunset Hills Land Company 27L130462
15-13858 Meglio Investments L P 15M220550
15-13860 Meglio Investments L P Amo Ltd Ptnsp 15M220033
15-13861 Koller Craft Plastic Products Inc 14N110064
15-13866 Fenton Properties Ii LLC 27O530201
15-13867 White Castle System Inc 10E420141
15-13868 White Castle System Inc 25M421806
15-13869 Mark Adolphus Family Trust Etal White Ca 21J231552
15-13870 White Castle System Emp Tr Trustees 28K440279
15-13871 White Castle System Inc 07J110886
15-13872 Huston Penny L 26P220162
15-13873 Holloway Ronald S Trustee Etal White Cas 22P220584
15-13874 White Castle System Inc 14N430241
15-13875 Ingram Family Limited Partnership An Ohi 13K340616
15-13876 White Castle System Inc 09G210586
15-13877 Baldridge Kenneth R Trustee 29V420093
15-13878 White Castle System Inc Acorporation 29J130158
15-13879 Mark Adolphus Family Trust 24K310741
15-13880 White Castle System Inc 11N220380
15-13881 Zbj LLC 17J421130
15-13882 Ingram Family Limited Partnership 14G212726
15-13883 JBR Realty Company 25M220652
15-13884 JBR Realty Company 23R541093
15-13885 Porta Fab Corporation 17V230066
15-13886 Storage Equities Ps Partners-V-Forder De 29K340037
15-13887 Public Storage Inc A California Corporat 23U520264
15-13888 Public Storageinc Dept Pt Mo 07103 23U610145
15-13889 Psac Development Partnersl P Dept Pt Mo 23U610156
15-13890 Public Storagepropertiesviiinc Dept Pt-M 10N210793
15-13891 Storage Trust Propertiesl P Dept Pt-Mo 2 09G140472
15-13892 Public Storage Inc A California Corporat 07H420412
15-13893 Public Storage Inc A California Corporat 07H440304
15-13894 Highland Mini Storage Gp Dept Pt-Mo 2800 07J220912
15-13895 Ps Co-Investment Partnersa Ca G P Dept P 10L620165
15-13896 Public Storagepropertiesviiinc Dept Pt-M 15N541908
15-13897 Public Storagepropertiesxx Inc Dept Pt-M 08F310136
15-13898 Storage Trust Propertiesl P Dept Pt-Mo 2 16M440056
15-13899 Storage Equities Etal Dept Pt Mo 24601 22K511256
15-13900 Storage Equities Etal Dept Pt Mo 24602 27H131062
15-13901 Storage Trust Propertiesl P Dept Pt-Mo 2 13K640211
15-13902 Ssc Acquisitions Inc A Decorp 16K110915
15-13903 Ssc Acquisitions Inc A Decorp 17L640445
15-13904 Psaf Development Partnersl P Dept Pt-Mo 25L610292
15-13905 Ferguson Storage Associates Dept Pt-Mo 2 12G130604
15-13906 Ferguson Storage Assocs Amo Ptnsp Dept P 12G130613
15-13907 Storage Trust Propertiesl P Dept Pt-Mo 2 12G130622
15-13908 Ferguson Storage Associates Dept Pt-Mo 2 12G410030
15-13909 Ferguson Storage Associates Dept Pt-Mo 2 12G410041
15-13910 Ferguson Storage Associates Dept Pt-Mo 2 12G410063
15-13911 Ferguson Storage Associates Dept Pt-Mo 2 12G410764
15-13912 Public Storageinstitutional Fund Iii Dep 26J531941
15-13913 Diversified Storage Fund Dept Pt-Mo 2662 25Q640195
15-13914 A Stockade Storage Of Stlouis Inc Dept P 14M440076
15-13915 St Louis Budget Storage Associates Lp De 14M440221
15-13916 A Stockade Storage Of Stlouis Inc Dept P 14M440285
15-13917 Trend Manufacturing Company 17V120202
15-13918 Hiberian L L C 13K640112
15-13919 Tenholder Properties Inc 29J420460
15-13920 Henges Jay G Trustee Schulte Steve W Tru 10P610052
15-13922 Hunter Engineering Co 11M310011
15-13923 Hunter Engineering Co 11M310031
15-13924 Hunter Engineering Co 11M320492
15-13925 Hunter Engineering Company 11M310581
15-13926 Hunter Engineering Company 11P340071
15-13927 Hunter Engineering Company 11M320030
15-13928 Hunter Engineering Company A Corp 11M310042
15-13929 Hunter Engineering Company 11M320580
15-13930 Hunter Engineering Company 11M310543
15-13931 Hunter Engineering Company 11M310570
15-13932 Hunter Engineering Company 11M320481
15-13933 Hunter Engineering Company 11M320571
15-13934 Vertex Chemical Corporation 22N231292
15-13935 Vertex Chemical Corporation 22N231308
15-13939 Mccarthy Holdings Inc 21L610232
15-13940 Chart Automotive Group Inc A Mo Corp 10K330360
15-13941 Unigroup Inc Amo Corp 27O630091
15-13944 Layne Western Company Inc 26O540065
15-13945 Walsh Donald M Diana Trustees 22T210745
15-13946 CHAPTER 100 ST LOUIS COUNTY 15O620156
15-13947 Zeller Properties LLC 26H230427
15-13948 Commercial Bank 15O630067
15-13949 Commercial Bank Of Westport 08K620637
15-13950 Wolff Shoe Manufacturing 27O440153
15-13951 Northrup Investment Company Inc 16M240362
15-13952 Stygar Family L L C 07H510201
15-13958 Castillon Donald H Carol J H/W Trs Eta 16P240590
15-13959 Kirchner Block & Brick Inc 09O520062
15-13961 B B C Corporation 26H120326
15-13962 B B C Corporation 26H231084
15-13963 Bluth Raymond A Carol L 25M320594
15-13965 Ssm Health Care St Louis 27P130866
15-13967 Ssm Health Care St Louis 20J631742
15-13968 Ssm Health Care St Louis 20J642421
15-13969 Thf Chesterfield Four Development L L C 17U220134
15-13972 Ronnies Plaza Inc A Missouri Corporation 27L320762
15-13974 Des Peres Property Northinc A Mo Corp 22O510493
15-13975 Des Peres Property South Inc A Mo Corpor 22O510507
15-13978 Des Peres Property South Inc 22O510543
15-13980 Krueger Properties LLC 27O630068
15-13981 Halls Ferry Cine L L C 09G220631
15-13982 Halls Ferry Cine L L C 09G220640
15-13983 Halls Ferry Cine L L C 09G220651
15-13986 Woodfield Properties Inc 16M210189
15-13987 Kennelwood Village Inc 22P220254
15-13988 Terra Rosa L Lc 17V220045
15-13989 Buckeye International Inc 14N630386
15-13990 Buckeye International Inc 14N610070
15-13991 W M 1 0 5 Hazelwood Mo L L C 10M630350
15-13992 Chandler Robert B Marilyn M H/W Trs 09L340160
15-13995 Phoenix Properties Mo Ii L L C 13K620192
15-13996 211 W Lockwoodllc 22L321661
15-13997 8282 Forsyth LLC 18K240036
15-13998 8282 Forsyth LLC 18K241257
15-13999 Henry Bratcher L L C 25O510078
15-14000 Hogan Real Estate L P Moltd Ptnsp 09O430103
15-14001 Crest Development Co Etal 23T540322
15-14002 Crest Development Co Of Mo Corp Etal 21K140400
15-14003 Boegeman Harry M Trustee 22N340639
15-14004 Waycliffe Development Corp 22M620541
15-14005 Boegeman Construction Co 28K440181
15-14006 Crest Development Co A Mocorp 25L610137
15-14007 Boegeman H M Realty Company 22N230620
15-14008 Waycliffe Development Corp Etal 22M140869
15-14009 Crest Development Co Etal 22N231142
15-14010 Boegeman H M Realty Co 27L420840
15-14011 Waycliffe Development Corp Etal 23S530496
15-14012 Baxter LLC 23T431286
15-14014 Boegeman Harry M Trustee 28K510976
15-14015 Boegeman H M Realty Co Etal 22N410763
15-14016 H M Bogeman Realty Co Etal 24J130054
15-14018 Cms Partnership LLC 17V520202
15-14019 Jost Real Estate L L C 14J410951
15-14020 Jost Real Estate L L C 14J130682
15-14021 Jost The Three Of Us LLC 14J110512
15-14022 Jost The Three Of Us LLC 14J410962
15-14023 Seventy Seven Hundred Building LLC 25H511451
15-14024 Seventy Seven Hundred Building LLC 25H511484
15-14025 Seventy Seven Hundred Building LLC 25H511523
15-14026 Seventy Seven Hundred Building Ptnsp 25H511725
15-14027 Big Bend 2000 Industrial LLC 22J440221
15-14028 Seventy Seven Hundred Building LLC 25J430180
15-14032 Fredman Brothers Furniture Coinc 14J110497
15-14033 Fredman Bros Furniture Company Inc 14J110486
15-14035 2501 Adie Investors L L C 14N330543
15-14037 Southwest Bankof St Louis 25L510224
15-14038 Southwest Bank Of St Louis 22T530384
15-14039 Southwest Bankof St Louis 27L310721
15-14040 Southwest Bank Of St Louis 33H410931
15-14042 Arsenal Credit Union 07H440087
15-14043 Kohn Real Estate L L C 17M430290
15-14044 Agatha Bloompetal Enterprises L L L P We 11N240997
15-14045 Agatha Bloompetal Enterprisesl L L P Wea 11O620240
15-14046 Purcell Properties L P 26O220442
15-14047 Gateway Frontier Properties Inc Sansone 19K641405
15-14048 Realty Associates Fund Viii L P The 19Q440220
15-14049 Reinhardt Joseph M Trustee 10O320192
15-14051 Lin Ferry Investment Group LLC 28K440213
15-14052 Ree Partnership LLC 26O220295
15-14058 Wyne William H Jr Trustee Etal 17O342562
15-14059 Opus Seven L Lc 32H410932
15-14060 Reliv International Inc 17U110442
15-14061 Reliv International Inc 17U130187
15-14062 Kitchin John C Jr & Carol S H/W 10O620223
15-14063 Kitchin John C Jr & Carol S H/W 10O640106
15-14064 Wilhite Family Limited Partnership 14O320471
15-14065 Price Howard B Trustee 17V210091
15-14066 Niezing Catrienus Frederika H/W Trus 27O540044
15-14068 St Louis County Water Company Mo Amer Wa 06L330047
15-14069 St Louis County Water Company Mo America 10L420332
15-14071 St Louis County Water Company Mo Amer Wa 21S110360
15-14072 St Louis County Water Company Mo Amer Wa 24Q540702
15-14073 St Louis County Water Company Mo Amer Wa 25V630199
15-14074 St Louis County Water Company 26J431182
15-14075 St Louis County Water Company 29J420020
15-14076 St Louis County Water Company Mo Amer Wa 30L440345
15-14077 St Louis County Water Company Mo America 06G430121
15-14078 St Louis County Water Company Mo Amer Wa 11O610175
15-14079 St Louis County Water Company Mo Amer Wa 16M220122
15-14080 St Louis County Water Company Mo Amer Wa 16R540063
15-14081 St Louis County Water Company Mo Amer Wa 16R640011
15-14082 St Louis County Water Company Mo Amer Wa 32L310097
15-14083 St Louis County Water Company Mo Amer Wa 33J620366
15-14084 St Louis County Water Company Mo Amer Wa 28P410321
15-14085 St Louis County Water Company 28N640070
15-14086 Missouri American Water Company 25Q341292
15-14087 St Louis County Water Company Mo Amer Wa 23X510112
15-14088 St Louis County Water Company Mo America 17M530521
15-14089 Frost Electricsupply Company 14N140182
15-14090 Adrienne’s Gold Mine Lp 16M540156
15-14091 Adriennes Goldmine Lp 16M540189
15-14093 B & L Management L L C 27O520200
15-14094 B & L Management L L C 11N120134
15-14095 Hoffmann Industries L L C 27O610664
15-14097 Kessler Page Development Co Llp A Mo Ltd 16K520303
15-14098 301 Sovereign Court Associates A Ptnp 22P130311
15-14103 Claybon Company L C A Mol L C 19K630472
15-14104 Brown Shoe Company 18K240047
15-14105 Brown Shoe Company Inc 18K230972
15-14107 J & D Steinback LLC 24K620060
15-14108 Js Westflo LLC 12M210075
15-14109 South Lindbergh Property LLC 28K440334
15-14110 Liebe Robert J Jr Trustee 17V240142
15-14111 Jd Acquisition Group LLC 10M340309
15-14112 J D Acquisition Group LLC 10M340291
15-14113 Garnett Partnership Elliott Data Systems 17V320156
15-14114 Whitehawk Investment Company L L C 16K530247
15-14115 N B West Real Estate Inc 21K110195
15-14116 West N B Real Estate Inc 21K220104
15-14117 West N B Real Estate Inc 21K220122
15-14118 N B West Real Estate Inc 21K220371
15-14119 N B West Real Estate Inca Corp 21K220214
15-14120 N B West Real Estate Inc 21K240940
15-14121 West Norman B & Mary Lou 21K240032
15-14122 N B West Real Estate Inc 22N410507
15-14123 French Gibbs Properties Inc 11N210172
15-14125 Surendra Gupta L L C 14N211550
15-14126 Surendra K Gupta L L C 14N211561
15-14127 Surendra K Gupta L L C 14N211572
15-14128 Surenda Gupta L L C 14N211583
15-14129 Surendra Gupta L L C 14N211594
15-14130 Gupta Real Estate L L C 15N531475
15-14131 American Radiolabeled Chemicals Inc 15N531486
15-14132 Surendra Gupta L L C 15N531497
15-14133 L J H Enterprise L L C 11F540454
15-14135 Hennessey Dole Company 16M530113
15-14136 Rudder Group Ll C 26O220204
15-14137 Rudder Group L L C A Missouri Limited L 26O220273
15-14139 1100 Research LLC 16M220100
15-14140 Blf L L C A Missouri Limited Liability C 14N230122
15-14141 Cresam Properties L L C 15O640352
15-14142 Sjt Restaurant Real Estate LLC 14O530395
15-14144 Jappa Sheldon Brenda L H/W 09O320082
15-14145 Naeda Services Inc 28P640793
15-14151 Cerame Trust Management L L C 09G130275
15-14152 4156 Shorelineproperties LLC 10P620293
15-14153 Sams Real Estate LLC 10P620084
15-14154 Williams R Lee Revocable Trust Etal 16L430722
15-14155 Swing A Round Real Est Co LLC 28O310552
15-14157 Merlo Automotive Group Inc 22M620550
15-14158 Rhodes Development Co L L C 22R310694
15-14159 Rhodes Development Co LLC 17U140120
15-14160 4305 Butler Hill LLC 30K110582
15-14161 501 Route 66 LLC 30Z310257
15-14162 217 Clarkson L L C 22T231371
15-14163 194 Clarkson LLC 22T231315
15-14164 50 E North Street L L C 29V640444
15-14165 60 E North Street L L C 29V640411
15-14166 70 E North Street L L C 29V640400
15-14167 730 S Kirkwood LLC 24M140234
15-14169 Jfo Enterprises A Mo Genptnsp 26O210494
15-14170 Ouellette Joseph F Catherine H/W 26O210441
15-14171 Express Enterprises LLC 09O340080
15-14172 Express Enterprises L L C 09O330311
15-14173 Progressive Facility Solutions L L C 14O310726
15-14174 Manufacturers Supplies Company 10P630032
15-14175 Two Oaks Corp The 25O420274
15-14176 Chesterfield 15450 L L C 18S220115
15-14177 Blessing Properties L L C 09J320197
15-14178 Slavik Enterprises LLC 28L620634
15-14179 Dsmeft L L C 14N230481
15-14180 Henry Plumbingsupply Coa Mo Corp 11N240281
15-14181 Skateport Center LLC 22Q340779
15-14182 United Food & Commercial Workers Union L 22Q340751
15-14183 Gross Holdingsinc 26J120453
15-14184 In Crease Ing Propertiesl L C 23M121214
15-14185 Redmond Eight LLC 21K141418
15-14186 Redmond Investments Ii L L C 23K430761
15-14187 Redmond Investment Ii L L C 22M132040
15-14188 Redmond Eight LLC 21K141427
15-14189 Sehnert Jane C Trustee Etal 17T240199
15-14190 Sehnert Thomas P Jane C H/W Trustees 17T240201
15-14191 Moose Partners L L C 21J242011
15-14192 54 Weldon L L C Etal 14O320273
15-14193 S T P Properties L L C 14N611301
15-14194 March Group L L C 10O530133
15-14195 Missouri Drywall & Supplyco 10L230472
15-14196 Missouri Drywall & Supplyco 10L510033
15-14197 John L Ziegenhein & Sonsundertakers 30K520240
15-14200 C & E Investment Properties Inc 27O640320
15-14202 Etzel Family Trust 26O210405
15-14203 Ziern Galleries Inc 20M440381
15-14204 Ziern Galleries Inc 20M440390
15-14205 Kutis Funeral Homes Inc 26K630027
15-14206 Kutis Funeral Home Inc 26K630049
15-14207 Kutis Funeral Home Inc 26K630050
15-14208 Kutis Funeral Home Inc 31K441250
15-14209 Najjar Car Care Iv Inc 24K220918
15-14211 Rockwood Bank 24V420274
15-14214 Firm Holdings L L C 17V340231
15-14215 Shivam Inc A Mo Corporation 26P310423
15-14216 R K Murphy L L C 26O620750
15-14218 Southern Boys Restaurantgroup Inc Diane 27L130422
15-14219 Drury Development Corporation 12L520496
15-14220 Arc Cafehld001 LLC 26P320372
15-14221 Carafiol Properties Company 22Q320117
15-14222 Drury Inn West Port Lp 14O630303
15-14223 Bar Plan Mutual Insurancecompany 21O210161
15-14224 Schneider LLC Etal 27J120135
15-14225 Pd Properties LLC 27O630134
15-14227 Hc 760 Office Parkway LLC 17N420542
15-14228 Clayton Building Partnership 17K611000
15-14230 Jeffrey Plaza Partnership 07J340016
15-14232 B & F Enterprises L L C 20M430335
15-14234 Reliance Bank 24R311031
15-14235 Reliance Bank 26P320141
15-14236 10550 BAPTIST CHURCH PLAZA LLC 28L640511
15-14237 8083 Watson LLC 24K220927
15-14238 Reliance Bank 32H410923
15-14239 Olive Warson Associates LLC 17M630511
15-14240 Olive Arcade Realty LLC 16P230801
15-14241 Reliance Bank 23U140730
15-14243 Reliance Bank 23U140721
15-14244 Reliance Bank 08L630998
15-14246 Santa Ana Holdings LLC 24V420313
15-14247 Santa Ana Holdings LLC 24V420331
15-14248 Santa Ana Holdings LLC 24V420340
15-14249 Santa Ana Holdings LLC 24V420351
15-14250 Santa Ana Holdings 13N610723
15-14251 G S S Properties L L C A Missouri Limit 11N430114
15-14252 Slcog Property Management & Leasing Co L 29L510833
15-14253 St Louis County Orthopedic Group Inc 29L510822
15-14254 Mch Holdings LLC 18Q530188
15-14255 Mch Holdings LLC 18Q530199
15-14256 Mch Holdings LLC 18Q530201
15-14258 Johnny Londoff Chevrolet Inc 09J320218
15-14259 Silver Mines Investments LLC 28K340586
15-14260 Silver Mines Investments L L C 14G640561
15-14261 Stokes Realty L L C 14N140193
15-14263 Schrader Funeral Home Inca Mo Corp 23S640243
15-14264 Schrader Funeral Home Inc 23S640573
15-14265 Schrader Funeral Home Eureka L L C 29V331290
15-14266 Keys To Success L L C 18S610659
15-14267 B C P Partnership A Mo Gen Ptnsp 10N230658
15-14268 B C P Partnership A Mo Gen Ptnsp 10N210362
15-14269 B C P Partnership A Mo Gen Ptnsp 10N140100
15-14270 B C P Partnership A Mo Gen Ptnsp 10N230676
15-14271 B & G Investment Partnership 14N130141
15-14272 Bg Investmentsa Mo General Ptnsp 10N140191
15-14273 Hunt Investment LLC 14N120122
15-14276 Lindbergh Plaza Investorsllc 29J230104
15-14277 Clayton Central Owner LLC 19K641009
15-14278 Superior Bank 09L620219
15-14279 Fenix Realty Company 30K540361
15-14280 Jby Company A Missouri Corporation 21J230283
15-14281 Jby Company Inc 21J231516
15-14282 Jby Company 21J231617
15-14285 Jby Company Inc 28O420596
15-14287 J & R Ventures Etal 16M610040
15-14288 Pi Beta Phi Fraternity 20Q410337
15-14289 Kramer Holdings LLC 28J410888
15-14290 St Louis Society For The Blind & Visuall 21K231351
15-14291 L J S Inc 27O540220
15-14292 630 Axminister L L C 27O530375
15-14293 6014 South Lindbergh L Lc 28K520766
15-14295 3623 Lemay Ferry Rd L L C 29J530855
15-14297 Hannex L L C 10M610275
15-14298 Happy Tails Realty Inc 14M440043
15-14299 Ziehl Dorsett Inn Plaza L L C 14O640340
15-14300 Ziehl Dorsett Inn Plaza L L C 14O640351
15-14301 Cwa Local 6300 Building Corporation 15N430202
15-14302 Questell Groupl L C New System 10P240110
15-14303 Ward Property Management LLC 14O640221
15-14304 Midamerica Hotels Corporation 28P630585
15-14305 Drury James L Trustee Etal 32H430714
15-14306 Midamerica Hotels Corporation 27Q641033
15-14307 Midamerica Hotels Corporation 30K210811
15-14310 P & A Drywall Supply Inc 15K541477
15-14311 P & A Drywall Supply Inc Etal 15K631095
15-14312 Bender Patricia A 15K631105
15-14313 Bender Family L L C 15K631149
15-14316 Coastal Development LLC 14N230074
15-14317 1699- 1701 South Hanley Road LLC 20K320681
15-14318 1699- 1701 South Hanley Road LLC 20K320829
15-14319 Green Katherine A Etal 29J110381
15-14320 Green Katherine A Etal 29J110392
15-14321 Sansone Fenton Plaza LLC 29O640092
15-14322 Gravois Development Partnership L L P 20K331096
15-14323 Fenton Development LLC 28O220404
15-14324 Fenton Development L L C 28O220413
15-14325 Fenton Development L L C 28O240570
15-14326 Lhret St Louis The L L C 11N140091
15-14331 Iret Mr9 L L C 15N141162
15-14332 Jdbm LLC 25O440085
15-14333 Mosburg Pickering L L C 16L530378
15-14334 On Target Investments LLC 28K340652
15-14335 Bubba Toy LLC Attn Dennis Callier 23R440640
15-14336 Chiu Steve Etal Yi-Hsiu Chiu 09M340103
15-14337 Angevine Investments LLC 25O440104
15-14338 Gravois Auto Repair Ii LLC 27K241024
15-14339 Gravois Auto Repair Ii LLC 27K241035
15-14340 Gravois Auto Repair LLC 26J430905
15-14342 S H J LLC A Missouri Limited Liability C 22P120163
15-14343 Cordes Robert G Revocable Living Trust 25P211570
15-14345 Cordes Robert G Revocable Living Trust 25P221452
15-14346 Ambler Properties LLC 22P220162
15-14347 Taro L L C 16M530399
15-14348 I T T Educational Services Inc 11O430124
15-14349 Scott & Nancy Zimmer L L C 15M410124
15-14352 Eelh LLC 29W530124
15-14353 Frank Wood Properties LLC 15M430243
15-14354 Strothkamp Bros Inc 23Q430767
15-14355 Bazan Walter Sr Etal 16L240044
15-14356 550 Spirit LLC 17V120264
15-14357 Wift Partners L L C 26O120294
15-14358 Durphy Daniel C & Jacqueline L H/W 21J212287
15-14359 Offshore Technologies LLC 24U631057
15-14360 Farmers & Merchants Bank 29V640389
15-14361 Poppe Rose M Trustee 25O510133
15-14362 Riva Ridge Properties L L C 27O620784
15-14363 Midwest Aviation Center LLC 18W630192
15-14364 G A Propertiesllc 19M321062
15-14365 G A Propertiesllc 19M321259
15-14366 G A Propertiesllc 19M321260
15-14367 Telle Properties L L C 20J241756
15-14368 Steib Investment Companyllc 23T430780
15-14369 Deer Creek Real Estate LLC 19M140485
15-14370 Deer Creek Real Estate LLC 19M140504
15-14371 Deer Creek Real Estate LLC 19M140540
15-14372 Deer Creek Real Estate LLC 19M140551
15-14374 Deer Creek Real Estate LLC 19M140595
15-14375 Deer Creek Real Estate LLC 19M140861
15-14376 Deer Creek Real Estate LLC 19M420051
15-14377 Deer Creek Real Estate LLC 19M421283
15-14378 Deer Creek Real Estate LLC 19M421382
15-14380 Kofad LLC 10N420062
15-14381 Rondal Investments Mo Genptnsp Kirchner 10N130091
15-14382 Kociela Arthur E Jr Meeghan M H/W 29U241299
15-14383 Selberts Enterprises LLC 29V520601
15-14384 Charmona Holdings L L C 10L411286
15-14385 Repking John L Joan E H/W Pool King 08J540415
15-14386 Hughes Fern Harold D H/H Trustees 13K340652
15-14387 Wilkendon Partnership 16P240600
15-14388 Precision Toolcompany 18J641593
15-14389 Crp Holdings B L P 10L130538
15-14390 Crp Holdings B L P 10M340446
15-14391 Crp Holdings B L P 10M340455
15-14394 Crp 2 Mid South Industrial LLC 15N330102
15-14396 Crp 2 Mid South Industrial LLC 15M420475
15-14397 Crp 2 Mid South Industrial LLC 15M420486
15-14398 Crp 2 Mid South Industrial LLC 16M630390
15-14399 Gabriel Partners L L C 11O530215
15-14400 Leinicke Craig E Connie M H/W 08K210612
15-14403 Mikelly Investments Inc 16M240373
15-14404 Ziehl Fee Fee Plaza L L C 13N240674
15-14405 Auer Mary Anne 24M531023
15-14406 Insight Holdings L L C 17V520257
15-14407 Eugene J Tichacek Family Trust 28N610073
15-14408 Colfin Cobalt I Ii Owner LLC 27O630101
15-14410 Colfin Cobalt I-Ii Owner LLC 15K310323
15-14411 Colfin Cobalt I-Ii Owner LLC 15K310334
15-14415 Robert & William Development L P 20K310240
15-14416 Realty Associates Fund X Lp 07H231717
15-14418 Triple V Motels Inc 25M442715
15-14419 Greater St Louis Automotive Association 22P220566
15-14421 Bentley Holdings LLC 17U520193
15-14422 Bentley Holdings L L C 17U520182
15-14423 Olde Towne Plaza LLC 23R431822
15-14425 Crp 2 Chesterfield LLC 18S420074
15-14427 Bomar Judith Trustee 07J340038
15-14428 Wolff Direct Inc 26O310165
15-14429 Noah Property LLC 10O120062
15-14431 Brannan/ Williams Holdings L L C 22L411201
15-14432 Patandy L L C 09N240321
15-14433 Dairy Maids Inc A Corp 11F110093
15-14434 Dairy Maids Inc The Corp 11F110161
15-14435 Dairy Maids Inc 14L341077
15-14436 Fleher Gregory S Etal Flair Holding Inc 11O620262
15-14437 Citizens Bank Of University City 17K541095
15-14438 Gate Gourmet Inc (Lessee) 12K630907
15-14439 9416 West Milton L L C 14L320353
15-14440 Ttjc Investments LLC 28L640423
15-14441 Gamemaster Athletic Company 17V240203
15-14445 Nhp/Mcshane Samc LLC 29L420413
15-14446 Nhp/Mcshane Samc LLC 29L420402
15-14449 Sports Tec Bowling LLC 16M510050
15-14450 226 Investments LLC 25O510122
15-14451 Murphy Family Partnershipl Pthe 09N140067
15-14452 Quartet Properties LLC 27K641138
15-14453 Firm Holdings Ii LLC 17V340253
15-14454 Brentwood Eagle L L C 21K511299
15-14455 Brentwood Eagles L L C 21K511301
15-14456 Dunaway Terry Steele Trustee 14O640212
15-14459 Riney Rodger O Trustee Coldwell Banker C 21O120291
15-14460 Scottrade Inc 22O530282
15-14461 Scottrade Inc 22O530293
15-14462 Scottrade Inc 22O530307
15-14463 Scottrade Inc 22O530316
15-14464 Scotttrade Inc 15O240194
15-14465 Scottrade Financial Services Inc 19Q230120
15-14466 Scottrade Financial Services Inc 19Q330154
15-14467 CHAPTER 100 ST LOUIS COUNTY 19Q520058
15-14470 13330 Lakefront Corp 10O540082
15-14471 Scullin Real Estate Ii L L C 29J430348
15-14472 Scullin Properties Inc 17U110574
15-14473 Kommerz Lc 17T240243
15-14474 Kippenberger Terry Michael Trustee 23K640683
15-14475 980 Kehrs Milll L C 21S111020
15-14476 807 Hazelwest L L C 09L531405
15-14477 Hoogland Williams Company L L C 22J420782
15-14478 Hoogland Williams Company L L C 22J420825
15-14479 Family Video Movie Club 07L340883
15-14480 Family Video Movie Club 07L340894
15-14481 Family Video Movie Club 07L340906
15-14482 Kathleen Knox Heslop Limited Partnership 06J630954
15-14483 Family Video Movie Clubs Inc 28H311908
15-14484 Keith Hoogland Limited Partnership 13L430633
15-14485 1650 N Lindbergh Buildingcorporation 15M120098
15-14486 1600 North Lindbergh Building LLC 15M120102
15-14487 Adlk Realty LLC 08O530059
15-14488 L D Realty L Lc Lindell Byron/Aaa Traile 09O220168
15-14490 Lewis James R Trustee Etal 23T630111
15-14491 Lewis James R Trustee Etal 24M121383
15-14492 Foerstel Edward W Etal 24M330204
15-14493 M & K Investments L L C 14N110103
15-14495 Rf Real Estatellc 17L540774
15-14496 Safe Deposit Company Themo Corp 19M440774
15-14497 Ploetze & Ploetze L L C 28J530139
15-14498 Arv2 LLC 09K140257
15-14499 Arv2 LLC 09K140268
15-14500 Arv2 LLC 09K140280
15-14501 Arv2 LLC 09K140367
15-14502 Arv2 LLC 09K140378
15-14503 Arv2 LLC 09K140389
15-14504 Arv2 LLC 09K140422
15-14505 Arv2 LLC 09K140433
15-14506 Arv2 LLC 09K140444
15-14507 Arv2 LLC 09K140455
15-14508 Landvatter Ready Mix Inc 24O420507
15-14509 Urban Green LLC 23M121205
15-14510 Dennis Denis J Jr Trustee Etal 28N120286
15-14511 Chemical Associates 28J410482
15-14512 Jc Southport L L C 27O530243
15-14513 Argonne Development L L C 23K111099
15-14514 Argonne Development L L C 23K111101
15-14515 Argonne Development L L C 23M110214
15-14517 Union Buildingcorporation Ofmichigan 09L520504
15-14518 Graphic Development Company Ll C 27L410973
15-14519 Hammack Properties L L C 13O320173
15-14520 Negwer Investments LLC 11J341263
15-14521 Negwer Investments LLC 11J321201
15-14522 Negwer Investments Limited Partnership 11J341032
15-14523 Negwer Investments LLC 11J341087
15-14524 Bwr Properties LLC 11J341274
15-14525 Negwer Robert W & Esther O Trs 11J340406
15-14526 M & P Landscaping Inc 16M640333
15-14527 M & P Landscaping Inc 15M321112
15-14528 J S W Properties L L C 26H541482
15-14529 Jsw Properties L L C 26H541561
15-14530 Irgens L L C 15M430375
15-14532 E Me Unified L L C 25O510188
15-14533 Sr Properties Ii L L C 17W510103
15-14534 Benson Electric Company 23J511753
15-14535 Advanced Plastics Inc 27J110268
15-14536 Advanced Plastics Inc 27J110279
15-14537 11745 Lackland LLC 15N420045
15-14538 11745 Lackland LLC 15N420078
15-14539 Carder Properties LLC 27O620773
15-14540 Rideout Investments LLC 25Q320949
15-14541 Jonas Holdings LLC 16M530124
15-14544 Long Holdings LLC Sam’s Steakhouse Inc 26K540465
15-14545 Micouleau Jean Pierre & Marie F H/W 24M111076
15-14546 Micouleau Jean Pierre Etal 24M111263
15-14547 White David W Marie T H/W 28J530513
15-14548 Summit Ventures L L C 25M640364
15-14549 Fenpark Properties LLC 27O540176
15-14550 426 Axminister L L C 27O630167
15-14551 Shocklee Bridgeland LLC 11N120639
15-14552 Shocklee Old State LLC 23T410661
15-14553 Chesterfield Land Company LLC The 19U510130
15-14554 Delta Dental Of Missouri 28M530213
15-14555 Cabarco L L C 17M530356
15-14556 Cmsj Real Estate Holding Company LLC 17V320200
15-14557 Super Clean Properties L L C 11H110392
15-14558 Super Clean Properties L L C 09G140395
15-14559 Yuhop LLC 16M420234
15-14560 Clayton Bemiston Owner LLC 19K640680
15-14561 Davidson L L C 27Q340976
15-14565 Eci B Holdings 4 LLC 09P320092
15-14566 Eci B Holdings 4 LLC 09P320081
15-14573 Metropolitan Urological Properties LLC 24M221087
15-14574 Aerospace Distlodge No 837 Bldg Corp 09L310031
15-14575 Phillips Blue Chip L L C 27O620814
15-14576 Phillips Blue Chip L L C I I I 23S640375
15-14580 Crp 3 Mcdonnell LLC 10L440150
15-14581 Crp 3 Mcdonnell LLC 10L440172
15-14582 Crp 3 Mcdonnell LLC 10L440161
15-14583 Just A Mess 10M330234
15-14584 Hanley Corner LLC 20K221085
15-14585 J M H Properties L L C A Mo Ltd Liabilit 16M540464
15-14586 Saitta Marcella E Trustee Co Saitta LLC 23S630512
15-14587 Mijon Iv 10L340142
15-14588 Mijon V L C 17V340022
15-14589 Anbren I L C 17O331090
15-14590 Sks Property Ll C 31H110550
15-14591 Smith Melvin Dale & Eileen J H/W Trustee 22P220658
15-14592 Smith Melvin Dale & Eileen J H/W Trustee 22P220281
15-14593 Multack Bldg L L C The 23M120444
15-14594 Oak Bend I LLC 24M321264
15-14595 Refrigeration Supplies Inc 21L311494
15-14596 Refrigeration Supplies Inc 21L311506
15-14597 Ccb Vii Carondelet LLC 18K310074
15-14598 Alexander Ventures LLC 22L531264
15-14599 O M G Real Estate L L C 17V530036
15-14600 Fallon Properties L L C 27J110169
15-14601 89 L L C 20K242132
15-14602 Becs Properties LLC 16L421380
15-14603 Collinsville Property L L C 17V340220
15-14604 Horn Lake Properties L L C 22P620443
15-14605 Health Services Of Dexter Inc Etal 18S521108
15-14607 Health Services Of Dexter Inc Etal 18S630327
15-14608 Montgomery First Nationalbank 28J121094
15-14609 Montgomery First Nationalbank 11N220182
15-14610 Montgomery First National Bank 16Q230370
15-14616 Health Services Of Dexter Inc Etal 18S521032
15-14617 Health Services Of Dexter Inc Etal 18S520943
15-14618 Health Services Of Dexter Inc Etal 18S630251
15-14619 Health Services Of Dexter Inc Etal 18S630316
15-14620 13275 Manchester Road LLC 22P620452
15-14621 LCRF LLC 11N240740
15-14622 Duke Property Management LLC 12L110956
15-14623 Contaic Investments LLC 22P620492
15-14624 Korn Investments Lp 28N630103
15-14625 Tmf Propertiesl L C 17V130043
15-14626 Marshall Scottenterprises Inc 22J141526
15-14627 Golden Corral Realty Corporation 28O320683
15-14629 Maplewood Mill Holdings L L C 25P221481
15-14630 Schneider Katherine B Trustee 24M440552
15-14631 Orlando Holdings LLC 14O530494
15-14632 Barks Propertydevelopment LLC 11G130935
15-14633 Barks Property Development LLC 10L630043
15-14634 Barks Property Development LLC 10L630120
15-14636 Elda Mo Ww R LLC 23V310471
15-14637 Elda Mo Ec LLC 10O510113
15-14638 Ebb Partners LLC 29W530092
15-14639 Loeffelman Real Estate Coa Mo Corp 28M130187
15-14640 Lex Situs Associates Llp 20O620316
15-14641 Vogel Investment Group LLC 27O640221
15-14644 Zynesher Pharmaceuticals Usa LLC Nesher 10O140064
15-14645 Zynesher Pharmaceuticals Usa LLC Nesher 15N440405
15-14646 Nesher Pharmaceuticals Usa LLC 09O130111
15-14647 Nesher Pharmaceuticals Usa LLC 09O410194
15-14648 Nesher Pharmaceuticals Usa LLC 09O410204
15-14649 Nesher Pharmaceuticals Usa LLC 09O410215
15-14650 CHAPTER 100 ST LOUIS COUNTY 10O140037
15-14651 Newby Seeger Industrial LLC 10K240182
15-14653 Ecms Properties LLC 10P620114
15-14654 Ecms Properties LLC 10P620271
15-14655 Rellim Real Estate L L C 15N542222
15-14656 Meramec Center LLC Etal 32L240455
15-14657 Cdf Holdings LLC 18V140111
15-14658 Altus Cassens Partners L L C 25O220205
15-14659 Cornerstone Industrial Fund I L L C 10O130072
15-14660 Altus Corporate 44 Partners L L C 26O610157
15-14663 Cornerstone Industrial Fund I L L C 15K220189
15-14665 Cornerstone Industrial Fund I L L C 15K220178
15-14666 Altus Questover 17O431211
15-14667 Cornerstone Retail Fund I L L C 17M430498
15-14668 Altus Corporate 44 Partners LLC 26O240073
15-14669 Runestone Investments L L C 10M520097
15-14670 Chesterfield Crossing Partners LLC 19S411286
15-14671 West Park Retail L L C 16P320744
15-14672 West Park Retail L L C 16P320735
15-14673 Altus Corporate 44 Partners L L C 26O330152
15-14674 Altus Corporate 44 Partners L L C 26O330163
15-14675 Altus Corporate 44 Partners L L C 26O610168
15-14676 West Park Retail L L C 16O110252
15-14677 Altus Corporate 44 Partners L L C 26O520067
15-14678 Altus Corporate 44 Partners L L C 26O520078
15-14680 Altus Industrial LLC 10O140138
15-14682 Altus Industrial LLC 26O110053
15-14683 Weber Hill Investments LLC 27M210200
15-14684 600 Parkway LLC 19Q230065
15-14687 Ebbd Investments LLC 14N110097
15-14688 Motortech Holding Limited 10L610133
15-14689 Motortech Holding Ltd 10K330030
15-14690 Larry & Carolyn Meyer LLC 15K120353
15-14691 Newby Latty LLC 10K520220
15-14693 Seventy Seventy L L C 10O530124
15-14694 South Hanley Investment Group L L C 21K320947
15-14695 Forest Lake Tennis Club Inc 16Q310032
15-14696 Olive Office Park Inc Ajn Trust 17L510579
15-14697 Oberon L L C 29K640524
15-14699 Laborers Local 110 Holding Company 27L410830
15-14705 Metro Five LLC 13O320131
15-14708 Mgr Realty Investment LLC 15N520134
15-14709 Sramek And Ribando LLC 25O220122
15-14710 Pershall Properties L L C 09K110304
15-14712 Chesterfield Medical Institute LLC 18S331392
15-14713 Bonan Properties L L C 18J111173
15-14714 Toms Service Center Inc Amo Corp 23M140217
15-14717 Gamco Commercial Properties Inc 10N420251
15-14718 Gamrock Inc Gregory A Marx 09O240111
15-14719 Gamrock Inc 09O230123
15-14720 Clarkson Oaks Professional Centre 22T510331
15-14723 Dewoskin Limited Partnership No 1 The 18K310371
15-14725 Wasserman Investments L L C 10M610220
15-14727 Schulze Partners Limiteda Caltd Ptnsp 19M441324
15-14728 North River LLC 11E321003
15-14729 Talico Investment Co L L C 14K430851
15-14730 13743 Shoreline Court E LLC 10P640217
15-14731 R D Properties L L C 25O530021
15-14739 B & F Enterprises L L C 20M440354
15-14744 Mje L L C 28L330502
15-14746 Mje L L C 26P320592
15-14747 Center St Louis LLC 25J421401
15-14748 Dogwood Group The L L C 27O620762
15-14753 Moore Food Distributors Inc Mo Corp 16L440321
15-14754 Flight Safety International Tax Advsors 13K610182
15-14756 Flightsafety International Inc Tax Advis 13K630058
15-14757 Flight Safety International Inc Tax Advi 09M310272
15-14759 Tbl Real Estate LLC 22S430735
15-14760 Tbl Real Estate LLC 22S440691
15-14761 Tbl Real Estate LLC 22S431396
15-14762 Geyer Inn LLC The 24N640708
15-14763 Missouri Investment Trust 22L441295
15-14764 Heartland Bank Co Midland States Bank 19M310622
15-14765 Gravois Home Savings & Loan Assn The Co 27L410803
15-14766 Heartland Bank Midland States Bank 19K640602
15-14768 Digital 1 Savvis Parkway L L C 19Q230111
15-14865 CRP # Lambert II LLC 09L120038
16-12617 Rose M Poppe 25O510133
16-12618 RS Investment Properties LLC 25O220096
16-12619 226 Investments LLC 25O510122
16-12620 Landav Properties LLC 25O510177
16-12621 Sramek & Ribando LLC 25O220122
16-12622 Bllumeyer Foundation Storage Inns Inc 32K420065
16-12623 Manchester Clarkson Co 23U610091
16-12624 US 1 100 Company 23Q640171
16-12627 Heyde Management LLC 15N230141
16-12628 Joseph D Van Riper 08J420988
16-12629 Blue Sky Property Management LLC 14N222451
16-12630 Blue Sky Property Management LLC 14N222734
16-12631 Blue Sky Property Management LLC 14N222761
16-12632 LCRF LLC 17O530925
16-12633 LCRF LLC 17O530961

 

[1] A complete list of 788 appeals addressed by this decision is attached as Decision Exhibit A

[2] Two sets of Complainants presented evidence at the hearing as to the ratio of assessment of Commercial properties.  The groups were labeled by the parties for ease of reference as “PAR” Complainants and “Sansone” Complainants.  Complainants are in the Sansone group.  Exhibits filed on behalf of PAR group are listed at the end of this Decision and Order.

[3] Representative for tax purposes of the Complainant.

[4] IAAO stands for the International Association of Assessing Officers.  Its members include government assessment officials and others interested in the administration of the property tax.  They provide education, resources and standards for ad valorem taxation.

[5] Witness Robert Denne also testified at the ratio hearing.   Denne is the expert witness for Complainants (“PAR” Complainants) represented by Attorney Patrick Keefe.  Denne has training, experience and education in the field of appraisal, mass appraisal and mass appraisal review.  The witness conducted a ratio study for the 2015 commercial properties in St. Louis County.  He used 306 sales in his study comparing the verified sale data to post-BOE valuations.  (Transcript p. 95)